For five years, he was the face of Eurovision’s authority, the man whose familiar catchphrase, “You’re good to go,” signaled the start of the continent’s most beloved, and chaotic, musical showdown. But this summer, Martin Österdahl, the Executive Supervisor of the Eurovision Song Contest, will be stepping down, closing the book on one of the most turbulent and transformative chapters in the competition’s history.
The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) confirmed the decision, bringing an end to a tenure that saw Eurovision through a global pandemic but also dragged it into a vortex of controversy that left many questioning its very soul. Österdahl’s departure isn’t just a changing of the guard; it’s the culmination of years of mounting pressure, internal dissatisfaction, and a series of public relations disasters that threatened to tarnish the contest’s legacy of unity and celebration.
When Martin Österdahl, a seasoned Swedish television producer, took the helm from Jon Ola Sand in 2020, there was a sense of optimism. With executive producer credits for the highly acclaimed 2013 and 2016 contests, he was seen as a safe pair of hands, someone who understood the unique blend of camp, culture, and high-stakes production that makes Eurovision tick. His mission was to steer the ship, uphold its apolitical values, and modernize its brand.
While he certainly succeeded on the modernization front—overseeing a significant expansion of Eurovision’s global digital footprint—his leadership became defined by the crises he navigated, and the ones many believe he created. The reaction to his resignation on social media tells the story. While the EBU thanked him for his “dedication and leadership,” the fan community were less diplomatic.
If one event could summarize the chaos of Österdahl’s final years, it was the 2024 contest in Malmö, Sweden. The event became a lightning rod for controversies that had been simmering for years.
The inclusion of Israel amidst the escalating conflict in Gaza sparked widespread protests, turning the host city into a fortress and pitting the EBU’s “non-political” stance against accusations of glaring hypocrisy. Critics pointed to the EBU’s previous bans on Russia and Belarus as evidence of a double standard. The pressure was immense, with calls for Österdahl’s removal intensifying. “Is it not insanely clear that @MartinOsterdahl needs to be sacked after this edition?” one user on X demanded in May 2024. “He, and the @EBU_HQ reference group have thrown @eurovision into disrepute.”
But the geopolitical firestorm was just one part of the Malmö meltdown. The shocking, last-minute disqualification of Dutch contestant Joost Klein over an “incident” with a production crew member sent shockwaves through the arena and beyond. The Dutch broadcaster, Avrotros, called the penalty “disproportionate,” and the lack of a clear, transparent process fueled a sense of injustice. When Österdahl appeared on screen during the Grand Final to validate the results, he was met with a wall of boos from the live audience—an unprecedented public rebuke of an Executive Supervisor.
Behind the scenes, things were reportedly just as tense. Delegations filed numerous complaints about a toxic working environment, prompting the EBU to launch an independent review. The feeling was that under Österdahl, the “brand” had been prioritized over the artists, the delegations, and the core values of the contest.
The drama in Malmö was the climax, but the foundations of Österdahl’s authority had been eroding for some time. In a significant internal shift, the EBU created a new role of “ESC Director” in early 2024, appointing Martin Green, the widely respected producer of the 2023 Liverpool contest. This move effectively sidelined Österdahl, stripping him of many public-facing duties.
By the time the 2025 selection season began, his role had been visibly diminished. The press conferences were handled by Green. Even Österdahl’s signature “Good to go” moment was gone, reduced to a silent thumbs-up gesture. The writing was on the wall: his influence was waning, and a change in leadership was already in motion.
To be fair, Österdahl’s tenure was not without significant accomplishments. His greatest triumph was undoubtedly steering Eurovision’s return in 2021. After the unprecedented cancellation in 2020 due to COVID-19, he oversaw the hugely successful Rotterdam contest, a logistical marvel that brought a sense of joy and normalcy back to millions under lockdown.
He also pushed the contest further into the global spotlight, introducing the “Rest of the World” televote and leveraging platforms like TikTok to engage a younger, more diverse audience. Under his watch, viewership numbers remained robust, and the Eurovision brand became more commercially powerful than ever.
With Österdahl’s departure, Eurovision finds itself at a crossroads. Martin Green will hold the reins in the interim, but the search for a permanent successor will be a crucial test for the EBU. The next leader will inherit a contest grappling with profound questions about its identity. How can it remain a unifying, apolitical event in an increasingly polarized world? How can it restore trust with its passionate fanbase and the participating broadcasters who felt let down?
The EBU has promised organizational reforms to strengthen governance and crisis management. For the millions who cherish Eurovision, the hope is that this change will usher in an era of greater transparency, accountability, and a renewed focus on the music and culture that lie at its heart.
Martin Österdahl’s legacy will be a complex one. He was a modernizer who expanded the contest’s reach but also a leader whose tenure will forever be linked to the controversies that nearly broke it. His resignation marks the end of a contentious chapter, leaving the stage clear for a new leader to perhaps, finally, get Eurovision back to what it does best: uniting Europe in song.
Image courtesy of Corinne Cumming and the European Broadcasting Union.
English 
French 
Dutch 